fiona.png
spreads.gif

Preferred Option Unveiled For Batemans Bay Bridge Replacement


Faster and easier travel in and around Batemans Bay is a step closer, with the preferred option today announced for the new Batemans Bay Bridge.

Member for Bega Andrew Constance today said there are issues with the existing structure, including an annual maintenance cost of up to $1 million as well as unreliable access across the Clyde River.

“The bridge has served the community well, but its capacity is limited and is causing social and economic impacts due to the lift span and restrictive load limit,” Mr Constance said.

“It’s no secret a new crossing is needed, which is why the NSW Government has provided $300 million towards new bridges across the Clyde River at Batemans Bay and Nelligen.

“The preferred option is to build a bridge with two lanes each way west of the existing crossing, which will be removed when the new structure opens to traffic.”

Mr Constance said after extensive community consultation, the option was chosen as it will have the least impact to motorists during the build and deliver the best outcomes for the community.

“I encourage all members of the community to find out more about the preferred option and give feedback because this bridge will change Batemans Bay for the better.

“It will improve traffic flow at the Kings and Princes Highway intersection and enable vehicles up to 26 metres in length to travel across the Clyde River.

“The next stage of the project will be to further refine the bridge design and develop the environmental assessment and the community will be kept informed.”

Community members can have a say by visiting rms.nsw.gov.au/batemansbaybridge before Friday 1 September. Media Release



#latest #BatemansBay #State #LocalStateFederal #Community

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts


Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.