fiona.png
spreads (7).gif

Can we afford the bells and whistles with less and less in the piggy bank



On 19 May 2015 the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) determined that Eurobodalla Shire Council could increase the general rate amount by 6.5%, including the rate peg amount, for a period of three years.The rate variation was applied from July 2015. At the end of the third year, rates will now stay at this new higher level and increase every year by the annual rate peg amount set by IPART.

Council told the community at the time that the (Special Rate Variation) SRV was required to:

- fund the increasing costs of infrastructure renewal and maintenance works on roads, bridges, sport and community facilities, playgrounds, pathways, and public toilets - respond to the NSW Government’s Fit for the Future financial criteria - address the funding shortfall from Federal Assistance Grants - address the impact of the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal's rate pegging amount that has not kept up with inflation or the increasing cost of building and construction materials for several years. They advised that any residual funds from completed works or after they had met their loan commitments will be spent on infrastructure renewals to reduce the funding gap.

As Eurobodalla Council looks towards a new Aquatic Centre and performing arts space in Batemans Bay couteresy of a gift of funding from the NSW and Federal Government there are mounting concerns that they have not applied due diligence to the fact that they have no current idea of the running costs, the real incomes from the venue, the maintenance costs and the depreciation. It is suggested that the Council might be pressing its nose to the wind when it comes to being Fit for the Future by overcommitting the Eurobodalla ratepayers to even greater exposure of not being able to meet infrastructure maintenance and renewal obligations. The Mayor has given an assurity that there will not be an application for another Special Rate Variation in this term of office however such assurities do not extend beyond her tenure of September 2020. ************************************************************************************************************ Revealed: $30bn needed for ageing infrastructure by Darragh O'Keeffe of Government News

New analysis lays bare the infrastructure maintenance backlog facing councils across Australia.

Ongoing under-investment in councils’ management of community assets is leading to increased risk and reduced safety, warns a major forthcoming report.While the Commonwealth and state governments have been focused on “nation building” infrastructure projects a new analysis shows that $30 billion of community assets is in poor condition and requires “significant renewal.”

The latest State of the Assets report, to be launched tomorrow by the Australian Local Government Association, also warns the proportion of infrastructure in poor condition is not decreasing despite increased spending on asset maintenance by councils since 2005.

The report also raises questions about the “currency and degree of maturity” of councils’ asset management and financial planning, and calls for regulators to boost oversight and support to the local government sector.“

The need for investment in infrastructure today exceeds $30 billion and is likely to continue to grow to meet productivity and safety requirements,” says the report authored by TechnologyOne Strategic Asset Management for ALGA.Local government in Australia manages $345 billion in community infrastructure, which includes roads, buildings, parks and water assets.

Experts and local government peak bodies have been calling for greater funding to help council’s manage ageing assets, through specific grant programs and by restoring financial assistance grants to 1 per cent of Commonwealth revenue.

The latest State of the Assets report, which is based on the responses of 408 councils or 75 per cent of the sector, shows that 9 per cent of sealed roads and 16 per cent of unsealed roads are in poor to very poor condition.Some 21 per cent of timber bridges and 4 per cent of concrete bridges are in poor to very condition, the report shows.

Last week Government News reported on new expert warnings that councils do not have sufficient funds to repair or replace thousands of ageing timber bridges.

The State of the Assets 2018 report shows that across all asset categories, councils reported 63 per cent of infrastructure was in good or very good condition, 28 per cent was in fair and 9 per cent in poor to very poor condition.

The report’s authors, Steve Verity of TechnologyOne and Anne Mellor from Planit Local, said that councils have made “significant headway” in sustaining community infrastructure by boosting their spend on asset renewal.Yet despite this investment and effort, the proportion of assets (by value) reported in poor condition “remains unchanged during this time,” they found.Councils’ capability questioned


Above: Proportion of assets in ‘poor condition’ and requiring repair. Figures drawn from State of the Assets 2018. The report also “raises doubt” about how local government is managing community infrastructure and planning for the future of ageing assets. The proportion of councils that have asset management plans in place has fallen in recent years across all asset categories except for roads, the report shows.While the proportion of road asset management plans held steady at 82 per cent, there was a fall in asset management planning in the other areas including: building and facilities – down from 83 per cent in 2015 to 70 per cent in 2017 parks and recreation areas – from 72 per cent to 61 per cent stormwater assets – from 71 per cent to 64 per cent water and wastewater assets – from 90 per cent to 31 per cent. Similarly, while long-term financial planning helps with funding asset renewal, the analysis found that the proportion of councils that had a long-term financial plan fell from 97 per cent in 2013 to 81 per cent last year. The proportion of councils including financial projections from their asset management plans in long-term financial plans has also decreased in recent years, the report shows. Must be a ‘shared task’ David O’Loughlin, president of ALGA, said that Commonwealth funding cuts had contributed to the “steady decline” in the number of councils with asset management and long-term financial plans since 2015.“It appears that most have tried to use the diminishing funds on road maintenance and let their asset knowledge diminish over time,” he told Government News. Cr O’Loughlin said that tackling the backlog in community infrastructure maintenance “has to be a shared task” for all levels of government. “Funding cuts since 1996 have steadily eroded local government’s ability to tackle this in a sustainable way, and it has to be reversed,” he argued. He added: “There simply is not enough money in the system to help local government, particularly in regional and rural communities, get on top of the asset and infrastructure load. ”Councils needed greater funding for asset maintenance as well as detailed objective studies on the state of their infrastructure and the cost required to bring it up to standard, Cr O’Loughlin added. Ongoing process needed The new analysis concludes that “it is apparent an ongoing process of continuous improvement for the local government sector is needed now.” It recommends that local government regulators audit councils’ asset management and long-term financial plans, and help councils increase their knowledge and confidence in determining costs and lifespans of their assets. The report also recommends that ALGA advocate for the required investment in local government infrastructure. ***** This article was first published in Government News and is republished here with permission. Sign up to the Government News newsletter.

#State #LocalStateFederal #Federal #Weekly #Opinion #Community #latest

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available until an alternate system of author verification can be investigated and hopefully installed.

Those who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts


Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.