spreads (15).gif

We can do better than this

The Beagle Editor, Your readers might be interested in the media release from the National Parks Association of NSW (NPA). It relates largely to the North Coast but the same agency, Forestry Corporation, operates here in Eurobodalla and the same litany of breaches to the licences exists here. The community is re-starting to document breaches and report them to the EPA. And here on the South Coast it’s the same myth of sustainability trotted out to defend current and future forestry practices. Meanwhile species who depend on tree hollows for instance are deprived of viable habitat. The lack of tree hollows in Corunna State Forest is testament to past logging operations, and leaving only 2 eucalypt feed trees per hectare will ensure that forest remains devoid of the biodiversity that has existed there in the past, including koalas.

Above: the remains of the logging and subsequent burning behind Mogo, east of the Highway in compartment 145. The image speaks for itself. We can do better than this. MEDIA RELEASE

29th August 2018

ABC revelations highlight environmental destruction of native forest logging—that is set to dramatically worsen

Last night's (28th Aug 2018) 7.30 report exposing plans to legalise ‘regeneration’ harvesting highlight how the NSW government is putting timber extraction over wildlife protection says the National Parks Association of NSW (NPA).

New logging laws (called Integrated Forestry Operations Approvals), currently being considered by the NSW government, promise sweeping changes to logging regulations. They depart completely from the original intent to balance timber production with conservation, as highlighted on 7.30 by former NSW Environment Minister, Bob Debus, who oversaw changes to logging in the 1990s.

Among the changes are proposals to legalise ‘regeneration’ logging in 140,000ha of coastal forests between Taree and Grafton, reduction of streamside buffers by 50%, and opening-up protected areas of old-growth and rainforest to make up projected timber shortfalls.

“As the 7.30 report showed, logging operations in NSW were already breaching environmental protections, and it has required diligent oversight over many years from community members to highlight these breaches”, said NPA CEO, Ms Alix Goodwin.

“It’s extraordinary that the clear fell logging exposed last night, previously brought to the attention of the former Environment Minister Speakman, and which the EPA said in writing was outside the current rules, is now to be legalised.

“Unsurprisingly Forestry Corporation welcomed the changes in their statement to 7.30. Effectively the new laws are a reward from the NSW government for years of logging in contravention of existing regulations.

“These new laws strip all pretence of sustainability away from logging in NSW. An industry that is clear felling koala and glider habitat can no longer claim that it’s ‘world’s best practice’.

“By proposing to remap and rezone old growth and rainforest the new laws effectively end the deal made between the industry and conservationists in the late 90s. These areas currently form part of the CAR reserve system designed to protect environmental and conservation values and which will be diminished as a result.

“The last vestiges of the social license of the logging industry are being swept away by these changes. The logging industry provides very few jobs, and the environmental destruction it causes is disproportionate to its contribution to society.

“It’s time to stop native forest logging and use our precious forests for what they do best: provide homes for wildlife, clean water supplies and the carbon stores that we so urgently need.”

Name and address supplied

#Opinion #Community #State #LocalStateFederal

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available until an alternate system of author verification can be investigated and hopefully installed.

Those who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.