spreads (21).gif

Regional forest campaigners say consultations a “sham“

Conservationists have described a forthcoming government consultation about the future of the woodchipping industry as a “sham.” Regional Forest Agreements (RFAs) which provide the legal framework for the industry are due to expire soon. Convener of the Chipstop campaign, Harriett Swift says that the first round of RFAs gave us 20 years of the most intensive native forest logging in NSW, record woodchip exports, more threatened species and a growing financial burden on NSW taxpayers. “The Government now wants to renew Regional Forest Agreements indefinitely with even weaker environmental controls.” She said that the first RFAs dated from the era of the chainsaw. “Within a few short years, we were in the era of the mechanical harvester. Now, it’s predicted that robots will soon take on the dangerous and often remote work of logging native forests.” “This is no time to be watering down environmental protections and weakening compliance,” she said. Chipstop will be urging the government to adopt a positive plan to manage the closure of the woodchipping industry. When that time comes, woodchippers must not simply walk away from the environmental destruction they have caused or their obligations to workers, as mining companies have done in the past.” Ms Swift said that if the RFAs are renewed, Wood Supply Agreements should be for realistic timeframes (no more than 5 years), should not contain “take or pay” clauses and not carry unwarranted penalties for winding up the industry. “This whole process is a farce and the State Government is using the holiday season to avoid public scrutiny of its shonky plans to legitimise a shonky woodchipping industry.” “The Government has clearly already made up its mind,” she said.

Between 2,500 and 3,000 trees from SE NSW and East Gippsland are cut down every working day to supply the Eden chipmill

For more information: CHIPSTOP campaign against woodchipping the SE forests, PO Box 797 Bega NSW 2550 Australia, Media Release

#Community #latest #Weekly #State #LocalStateFederal #Bega

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.