spreads (27).gif

Mackay Park Sunset C'tee suggestions

Once again the Mackay Park Arts aquatic Centre is in the news (Update on the Regional Aquatic and Arts facility 23/1/2018 The Beagle) .

I applaud the contributions so far from Perfex, U3A and the Pastel society stressing the desire for a reflection of the value of Arts in this community, attempts to recognise the future of Arts in the community as a real component for consideration and RESPECT for the Arts to be reflected in the building.

There is another angle that continues to be important and integral to the development of the Mackay Precinct: its process.

At the moment there is continuing unease in the way the Sunset committee has been structured and operates, echoed particularly by calls for a truly transparent, informed discussion with the members , and by extension, their community; and the desire for actual ‘say’ in it.

In the hope of remedying some of these concerns and to increase satisfaction with in the Committee, and improve its credibility in the community I offer the following:.

Suggestions re Sunset Committee:

  • Change Terms of Reference to say that members must attend 90% (or similar) meetings or their place is declared vacant

  • Increase representation of the Arts community and the Pool community (after all, these are the main focus of the development at this stage)

  • All members have input to the agenda well ahead of time and have adequate time allocated for discussion

  • Time is set aside early in the proceedings for ‘other business’ – to ensure adequate time for discussion

  • Greater feedback (and better) to community allowed and encouraged

  • More power to members – not just advisory and giving input. They must see some value placed on their presence and input to make it worthwhile, for members and for community credibility

  • To meet more often with plenty of prep time, to be well and fully–informed to allow real discussion

  • Information to be sent to the members well ahead of the meetings

  • More transparency by Council on the main topic AND its related topics (such as demolition of Bowlo,RMS plans, etc)

  • Members have input to further grant round applications

  • Members (and community) to have plenty of input and say in the re-development of the Concept plan

  • Community ideas and suggestions are seen to be included and reflected in the plans and the precinct.

  • Be open and transparent about ‘other plans’ for the precinct (other than the Aquatic Arts Centre), allow input to those other plans, and reflect the community wishes in those plans.

We need more community trust and involvement in both the process and the vision for the centre to be both viable, loved and used.

cheers Dr Sue Mackenzie

#Opinion #Council #LocalStateFederal

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.