spreads (27).gif

Pay Parking in BBay - some history

Dear Editor Pay-parking in Batemans Bay was really all about revenue raising to top up reducing other income streams, initially. If the numbers are looked at properly with administration costs, rangers council vehicle use etc. it is likely a loss would be the end result over the total period pay parking has been in place. The argument could be the Shires ratepayers and residents, as well as businesses, have already paid for and supplied parking areas all over the shire via development fees and rates. Pay-parking is really a case of paying for something already paid for a second time. If pay parking is going to be removed then all pay parking should be removed – Perry St as well. Timed parking zones and foot sloggers should be used.

Because of the increase numbers of fee parking spots being created by the owners of the big shopping precincts in Batemans Bay the businesses with pay parking out side them are at a disadvantage – or being discriminated against. The original pay-parking spiel was about about raising funds to build a multi level car park in Batemans Bay, the street maintenance etc. The bullsh*t came later when it was decided a multi level car park wouldn’t be happening because of the car parks that had now been provided by, what was then, the Stocklands Mall development now the Village Centre. What occurred in relation to the Bay's pay-parking arrangements has favoured the mall development.

The report in Councils upcoming meeting Agenda for December 13th does not reflect the historic facts. Allan Brown Catalina

#Opinion #Council

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.