spreads (14).gif

Phillips: Tourism Package Leaves Local Businesses Up In The Air

In a media release issued by Stephen Jones MP, Member For Whitlam, Sharon Bird MP, Member For Cunningham and Fiona Phillips MP, Member For Gilmore the three Federal members raised questions around the latest announcement offering Tourism Support Packages "After months of indecision the Morrison Government has announced its tourism support package.

"It is driven by politics not economics. The benefits are geared towards marginal Government electorates.

"It won’t support jobs and businesses in the Illawarra, Southern Highlands, Shoalhaven and the Eurobodalla.

"Under the package people from our region will be given incentives to go to Queensland, Victoria, Tasmania, and even South Australia to spend their money.

"But no incentives will be offered for people to come to the Illawarra or the bushfire hit regions of the Shoalhaven and Eurobodalla. Shellharbour and Moruya airports are both located in tourism areas significantly impacted by COVID-19 but have curiously been left out of the package.

"This means valuable tourism dollars are leaving the region, not coming back to us.

"There are hundreds of businesses and thousands of workers whose livelihoods have been impacted by the coronavirus restrictions. The return of international tourism is still a long way off.

"In a few weeks’ time Job Keeper will end. The Morrison Government has no plan to support the hundreds of businesses that will have to close their doors when this happens.

"Local Labor MPs are calling on the Morrison Government to extend Job Keeper for these businesses. They are good businesses supporting local jobs who have had a significant reduction in their income.

"We support the restrictions that have had to be put in place to protect us from coronavirus.

"But it should follow that if the Government makes a decision in the national interest that impacts heavily on one particular industry, it should support that industry until the restriction can be lifted."

Above: Shellharbour and Moruya airports are both located in tourism areas significantly impacted by COVID-19 but have curiously been left out of the package No 'ticket to recovery' for remote and regional airports: ALGA

The Federal Government’s new tourism and aviation support package will do little to ease the crisis facing many regional airports, the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) said today. While acknowledging the $1.2 billion package will help the struggling aviation and regional tourism sectors transition past the end of the JobKeeper program, ALGA said it offered nothing substantive to regional airports, many of which are struggling to survive. Since the onset of the pandemic, revenues at some local council-owned airports have collapsed by as much as 90 percent. Moreover, despite sharply fewer regular airline flights, councils are still having to pay the full costs of compliance, safety, and maintenance for their airports. ALGA President Cr Linda Scott said councils are grateful for ongoing federal and state government programs to support or enhance aviation safety and accessibility. “There are almost 4000 jobs generated by regional and remote airport precincts across the country and given the uncertainties about when the pandemic will be brought under control, federal and state governments need to reconsider their level of direct support for local government. “Local government has been given little direct financial support during Covid-19, apart from subsidies to help meet the costs of government-mandated security screening of passengers and freight,” Cr Scott said. “Because of the rising costs of compliance, few regional airports came to this crisis in strong financial position. “Nonetheless, they have waived landing fees and passenger levies for airline operators so their communities can continue to travel for work, health or education.” Cr Scott added that because local governments were not eligible for JobKeeper payments, councils have struggled to hold on to airport staff. “There’s a real risk that without further direct support, these skilled people will leave their communities in search of work elsewhere – making a return to normal operations for regional airports extremely difficult in the short term.” About 200 airports are owned by councils, and besides keeping local communities connected with large urban centres, these facilities are needed for medical services and disaster emergencies. Local government is committed to keeping its airports open, even where these are running at a loss and require cross-subsidies that hamper the ability to deliver essential services and functions. “We’re now at a point, however, where councils are looking to have to cut community services to sustain their airports,” Cr Scott said.

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available

NOTE to those wishing to comment: Tell us your name. First and second name. Make a comment and own it. Have a conversation but let the other person know who you are. No name - no publishing of your comment - simple. 

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts. 

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.