spreads (21).gif

Mackay Park DA Approved

The Beagle Editor,

This week, the state Southern Regional Planning Panel approved the council’s controversial Development Application for the Mackay Park project – see the DA and Panel determination at

The Planning Panel members did note the community views in their report approving the DA but were constrained in their deliberation by the fairly narrow range of criteria they can take into consideration - these criteria are strictly related to purely planning issues that do not include community views about a development or even if it is in the public interest. Council now will no doubt proceed to calling tenders from the list they have already made - so it will not be an open tender process - and when these tenders are in, councillors have resolved to then determine if the project is "affordable" but there is no current publicly available business case for any of us hoi polloi to see if this could be the case. If council can't afford to forgo a 2.6% rate increase this year, or give an equivalent rebate to ratepayers as is happening in the Shoalhaven, one must wonder how councillors could agree to take on additional on-going costs - possibly between $2 and $3 million per year - in subsidising the development's operations and maintenance. These on-going costs are on top of losses to the community when assets like the Batemans Bay Community Centre and the Visitor Information Centre are sold to help pay the project's capital costs. Councillors, please be responsible. If you're challenged by the system and the numbers, put it to the pub test!.... better still, seeing the pubs are out of action, have a shire-wide survey mailed out detailing the facts and asking a few objective questions!

Jeff de Jager


COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.