fiona.png
spreads (15).gif

Efficiency promises of Community Action Alliance, Community Voice, and others have come to nothing

The Beagle Editor, This Innes budget has been prepared in reduced circumstances following the bushfires and moving into the unknown environment of Covid 19. It is a “plan for the future, based on prudent assumptions, committed to maintaining financial sustainability and risk, efficient and effective services and value for money.” This budget follows both 1. a slight easing of IPART's indexation arrangements and 2. a further continuation and indexation of the ever permanent SRV . IPART's indexation allowance of 2.6% would seem close to inflation. Over the last decade or more indexation was less than CPI . This previous tougher quantum was designed to encourage efficiency and productivity gains by local government. Technology has resulted in cheaper goods and services, this should include Council services. Water, as usual has increased at a greater rate, 3% and 2.7%, designed to hit inland owners more. The boiling frog principle is alive and well. Broadly speaking the budgets ins and outs are more of the same plus 2.6%. Many responsible organisations are planning for reduced income and are planning to align this with reduced expenditure. ESC help for businesses and individuals in trouble by way of rate relief or other help is negligible. While Covid19 is recognised by the ESC from a health perspective there are no budget concerns expressed in these papers. Early planning and action around reduced income could prevent a later crisis. Perhaps it is assumed State government will assist councils in trouble OR the ESC believe they can take the easy way out and run to IPART again for yet another SRV. The ESC has a responsibility to do better than this. They need to communicate their thinking to residents. Councillors and senior staff have rights and responsibilities, they need to think harder about the latter. We are coming into the year 5 of this council , the efficiency promises of Community Action Alliance, Community Voice, and others have come to nothing. The last annual report referred to expenses associated with “increased staff effort” . Does this continue in 2021, what does it actually mean , or is it commercial in confidence? So , another Innes budget, no change in direction, no response to uncertain times, all very disappointing ,again. Owen Cartledge.


COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts


Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.