spreads (27).gif

Bushfire recommendations mixed, but who pays

"The NSW Government must stump up funding to back its bushfire inquiry recommendations." That’s the message from Eurobodalla Mayor Liz Innes following release of the 76 recommendations last Tuesday.

Clr Innes said she won’t accept any additional burden on ratepayers.

“The NSW Bushfire Inquiry recommendations are a mixed bag, and my big worry is who pays,” she said.

Clr Innes said the inquiry confirmed an increased likelihood for more firestorms of the type experienced last summer and welcomed recognition that more funding was required to help our firefighters on the front line.

“I’m pleased to see some of Eurobodalla Council’s key recommendations – improving the resilience of telecommunications, power and roads, and reviewing vegetation clearing policies to reduce complexity and cost – were adopted,” Clr Innes said.

“My big concern is the clear expectation that local councils will have to shoulder more of the burden when we simply do not have the resources to do more. Rates would have to go up, and that is not acceptable.”

Clr Innes said our community learned tough lessons during Black Summer.

“These lessons need to be shared and the minister should hear our experiences first hand,” she said.

“I invite the NSW Emergency Services Minister David Elliot to visit Eurobodalla.

“The NSW Government must cost the recommendations and must identify who will pay. Otherwise these are a set of recommendations going nowhere.”

Clr Innes said the NSW Government still had the ideal opportunity to bring real reform, including better integration of emergency service agencies and infrastructure.

“If the Minister visits, I look forward to showing him our outdated fire-control centre in Moruya, and the hall and four plastic tubs we ran our emergency operations centre from,” Clr Innes said.

“The NSW Government has previously shown support for a new regional integrated emergency service precinct in Moruya so we have decent facilities for the RFS, SES, NSW Fire and Rescue, Ambulance Service and an Emergency Operations Centre. This type of infrastructure should be funded by the government instead of pushing the burden to local ratepayers.

“We have been advocating for more than five years now. It really is time the government got this emergency services precinct built for our community.

“We’re also calling for the positions of Local Emergency Management Officers to be moved to the NSW emergency services agencies as full-time professional roles.

“Our Council LEMOs did an amazing job last summer, but we are expecting our staff, who already have full-time jobs, to tackle the emergency services function on top of that. This is not a resilient solution for the future. Our officers are needed to manage our roads, bridges, and water and sewer systems during disasters.”

Clr Innes said she had listened to many concerns from local land owners regarding the assertion the RFS would be given rights to enter properties and clear land or conduct burns if land owners failed to.

“This is unpalatable for most landowners and the details absolutely need to be worked through,” she said.

“And the expectation that councils could inspect and enforce private property compliance to bushfire standards is unrealistic. That is not and should not be our job.

“There also needs to be more hazard reduction and management of fuel loads in national parks and state forests. I know how it feels to sit and wait for fire to roar through unprepared government-owned land toward your home. That has to change.”

Clr Innes said the recommendations to pursue better air firefighting support, improve training for government personnel and volunteers running evacuation centres, and integrating fire control and emergency operations centre were welcome.

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.