fiona xmas.png
spreads (7).gif

Just how much have the Botanic Gardens cost since 1994


The Beagle Editor

Late last year, by media release, our Council announced it had accepted a multi million dollar grant to upgrade facilities at the Eurobodalla Regional Botanic Gardens.

The Botanic Gardens project has been being developed or redeveloped since the 1994 bush fires when it was razed and completely burnt out. After the fires advice was sought about whether to proceed or not with the project. Council agreed to proceed providing recurrent budgets till the year 2000. After that the project was expected to find is own sources of funding.

But for some reason the Council resolution of the time wasn’t adhered to .

Since then recurrent budgets of around $800,000 annually have been provided from ratepayer funding, as well as grant funds applied for and accepted. The rebuilding and general operations of the Botanic Gardens south of Batemans Bay at Deep Creek have been occurring for around 25 years now. A lot of our rates along with other public funds have been ploughed into the project now. When council was recently asked, by written correspondence, what the recurrent budgets and grant funds now total, they replied that a cost of $30 an hour would apply to provide the information required because it would take time and staff resources. The reply was signed by Councils Director Corporate and Commercial Services.

Surely council has a separate ledger or similar documenting all costs, budgets etc. applying to the Eurobodalla Regional Botanic Gardens that the press of a button can access and reveal. With the Botanic Gardens being as successful as is claimed 70,000 visitations last year or about 1300 a week almost 200 a day you’d expect those at council responsible for finances, including the Audit Committee councillors, would know the numbers. But for some unknown reason they haven’t got a clue when asked.

Name and Address Supplied

#Opinion

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available until an alternate system of author verification can be investigated and hopefully installed.

Those who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts


Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.