spreads (15).gif

Super Saturday’s Lessons

The Beagle Editor,

So far the coalition’s proposed business tax cuts are high on the lists of reasons why voters did what they did last Saturday. Let’s hope that analysts, and voters, don’t blindly accept the political arguments for the business tax cuts as if they might be the best or only answers for the nation and that independently, they start do some sums on what the proposed tax cuts would really do towards stimulating the economy, creating jobs, improving business confidence for more investment etc. Hopefully, the sums will include the secondary impacts of significantly reduced business tax revenue and lower social security payments due to higher employment levels.

Simply put, businesses can only improve their profitability by increasing turnover and/or reducing expenses. Increased turnover will achieve all the good effects anticipated and won’t necessitate reduced business taxation revenue. Typical small businesses enjoying even small percentage increases in turnover will see higher percentage increases in their nett profit before tax – do the sums and see!

While government doesn’t need to implement the desperate stimulus measures taken to counter the effects of the GFC, introducing changes that will lead to small increases in the disposable income of taxpayers and pensioners will see a higher business turnover. Such “remedies” might include reduced personal taxation, preservation of penalty rates, indexing Medicare thresholds, indexing pensions and revising asset tests, being fair dinkum with child care and maternity leave payments, and so on the list goes with measures the political parties don’t see as common sense even if the electors do – as was evident perhaps last Saturday. As they say in the advert, “Simple!”, eh?

Jeff de Jager


#Opinion #Paper

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available until an alternate system of author verification can be investigated and hopefully installed.

Those who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.