fiona xmas.png
spreads (7).gif

The Rural Lands Strategy Proposal - It's all a done deal - no point putting in a submission ....

Not content with the "assurances" given by Eurobodalla Shire Council's Mayor Innes Clyde River oyster growers are continuing to voice their concerns that the proposed Rural Land Strategy is simply a gateway into expansion of subdivisions into the reaches of our pristine waterways. Mayor Innes advised ABC South East listeners that the clearing of a subdivision referred to in a recent presentation by Mr McAsh to a council meeting was in fact an illegal activity. It is that very response that raises alarms with farmers and those protesting the proposal saying that Council has a poor track record of proactively ensuring compliance and have neither the resources or the capacity to oversee the forecast 255 new rural properties that might result from the proposal going through. Mr McAsh concedes that while most won't be on the Clyde River all will be on a catchment somewhere in the Land of Many Waters and that each of our rivers provides the life blood to our oyster growers along what is called the Australia Oyster Coast. Contrary to the Mayors statement that the councillors listened carefully to what Mr McAsh had to say in his five minute presentation during Public Access it was noted by those in the gallery that the councillors were predominantly disinterested in what he was saying. Mr McAsh later commented that he had in fact felt as if he was a "dirty nappy" in the chamber the way he was treated and that while the period for submissions was still open he had came away feeling that it was all a done deal and his presentation, along with others that morning, was little more than a waste of time.

Above: Kevin McAsh - Oyster farmer of the Clyde River - Voicing concerns at Eurobodalla Council's Rural Land Strategy Proposal - June 2018


COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available until an alternate system of author verification can be investigated and hopefully installed.

Those who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.