spreads (6).gif

Are Council jumping in the deep end?

The Editor

The recent council meeting discussing a proposed new aquatic and performing arts centre for Batemans Bay with a grant fund offer by the State Government is likely a long way off going ahead in any shape or form At the moment there is money just as a promise providing certain criteria is met that satisfies the Government and those responsible for assessing a properly prepared design plan. The Council meeting confirmed that they haven't been formally notified of the grant so all we have is a promise by Andrew Constance. A promise for $26m on a $46m project with no guarantees of where the rest is coming from isn't very assuring when we hear the local member wants bulldozers on site in March next year. You wouldn't begin any project without having your budget locked down. Council and our Councillors will be required to support a detailed business case including future maintenance provisions and identify where the difference between the Grant offers and the total estimated cost or price will come from. Listening to the Mayor's description of how they were going to ask architects to draw up plans so the work can be done in stages based on future grants doesn't give any sense of security and it was very evident listening to her that Council is well out of its depth having never overseen a project of this scale that has no figures on the table of running costs or projected incomes. The electioneering promises of a couple of our present councillors in relation to the new indoor heated pool or aquatic centre may not be affordable over time with out significant increases in councils income streams. Our councillors need to hold some public meetings and properly explain where all the initial funding and future maintenance funding will come from if the planned project is to go ahead and survive.

Allan Brown



COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available until an alternate system of author verification can be investigated and hopefully installed.

Those who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.