fiona.png
spreads (7).gif

Regional Australia Stranded On A Second-Rate Copper NBN


STEPHEN JONES MP SHADOW MINISTER FOR REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SHADOW MINISTER FOR REGIONAL SERVICES, TERRITORIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT MEMBER FOR WHITLAM

REGIONAL AUSTRALIA STRANDED ON A SECOND-RATE COPPER NBN It has been confirmed that there is no plan to upgrade the copper “Fibre to the Node” NBN, leaving Regional Australia stuck on this increasingly outmoded technology for the foreseeable future.

Answers to a question I asked of the Department of Communications in Sydney hearings of the Joint Standing Committee on the National Broadband Network say:

“as nbn has previously outlined, there is no current plan to upgrade specific sections of the network”

[Question No 10, Committee Hearing 1 August 2017, emphasis added]

This is bad news for Regional Australia for several reasons:

  • Regional towns will be left stranded on a second rate, copper NBN indefinitely – with no upgrade path planned.

  • Copper FTTN has been the main technology rolled out in regional towns in the past few years.

  • Very few of these regional towns will ever be able to make the business case to nbn for an expensive upgrade to fibre optic cable.

At the same hearing, NBN CEO Mr Morrow told the NBN Committee that

“Those that are closer to the node will have 100 Mbps and those that are far from the node will have 25 Mbps” and “ shorter copper distance [which] raises your speed”.


These statements confirm Labor’s concerns about the copper NBN.

Regional Australia is waking up to the dud deal that has been forced on them by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and his National Party and Liberal Party MPs and Senators.

Turnbull’s NBN has cost us billions in switching to outmoded copper technology – Regional Australians are right to be angry about this. Media Release

#Opinion #Federal #LocalStateFederal #Community

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available until an alternate system of author verification can be investigated and hopefully installed.

Those who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts


Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.