What will it take to win the pools?

Dear Beagle Editor, It's not correct that councillors can but choose one of the two options put forward in next Tuesday's meeting agenda.

To name just a few other choices, Councillors can make amendments to bring the proposal in line with the community's wishes, they can demand that they be given the opportunity to endorse or otherwise the (phantom?) Draft Pools Strategy on which Otium's plan is based or they can chuck it out altogether.

Sensible things for councillors to do would be to introduce amendments to -

- include a 50 metre pool in place of the 25 metre pool in Option 1

- insist that the report shows estimated depreciation and borrowing costs so that they, Councillors, are not blind to the full consequences of the decision they are being asked to make

- include a condition that should grants be obtained, the existing community centre and visitor information centre be sold as soon as practical when the new facility is available and proceeds be used to reduce the loans for the new facility

In any case, if some of the state funding is for sporting infrastructure, how would the proposed Option 1 qualify when the Otium report quotes from a phantom unapproved draft Pools Strategy that clearly nominates the Narooma pool, which is 50 metres, as the shire's competitive swimming venue? Name and address provided


COMMENTS : You can use a pen name or better yet use your real name, you must provide a valid email address (that does not get published) and your comment will be moderated prior to approval (or rejection if that is the determination of the moderator). Refer to our Terms and Conditions if you have any questions) 

Please note that from time to time comments are archived. If you are looking for a previous comment no longer visible please contact us. Last Archived 7th July 2019