spreads (2).gif

Congrats to Clr McGinlay for remaining true to his Oath of Office and true to the ratepayers of Euro

Mayor Innes and Councillors Mayne, Brown, Pollock, Thomson, Nathan, Constable and Tait,

It is beyond comprehension that you knowingly and deliberately defied the Local Government Act today when you voted to close the meeting.

LGA Section 10D(1) states: “The grounds on which part of a meeting is closed must be stated in the decision to close that part of the meeting and must be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.”

LGA Section 10D(2) states: “The grounds must specify the following:

b) the matter that is to be discussed during the closed part of the meeting.”

Please note: “is to be discussed” is future tense, something you are going to discuss in closed session.

This is contrary to the GM’s advice when she referred to only recording the grounds(and matter) in the minutes, which would be past tense..

The public, who were present at the meeting, were supposed to be informed of these grounds, including the matter to be discussed, before you moved into closed session. Otherwise, how can the public make representations to the meeting as to whether the meeting should be closed, if they don’t know the matter to be discussed? (Code of Meeting Practice 12.7)

Councillor Constable at least had the gumption to question the closure motion, but in the end you all heeded the GM’s advice which was, once again, wrong. As it was when she assured councillors that the ‘tendering’ process was vindicated in the review of the Huntfest approval process – which it wasn’t.

You ignored representations made by the public supplying you with the lawful facts, violated your Oath of office in not complying with LGA, failed to think for yourselves and failed the ratepayers that elected you.

And the icing on the cake:

This closed meeting, with secrecy orchestrated by the GM herself, was to vote on a 5 year extension of her contract, which you actually approved!


Patricia Gardiner

Deua River Valley

#Opinion #Dale

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.