spreads (2).gif

100 Days After The Royal Commission, Bushfire Survivors Are Still Waiting For Action

One hundred days after the Bushfire Royal Commission handed down its findings, bushfire survivors are still waiting on the federal government to take clear, decisive action on all recommendations.

“It has been 100 days since our members traveled to Canberra to hear the Commission’s findings first hand, we’re still waiting for all recommendations to be taken seriously,” said Jo Dodds, President, Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action (BSCA).

“The government has only ‘noted’ or announced its ‘in principle’ support for many recommendations. Bushfire survivors, emergency workers and volunteers deserve clear answers, detailed timelines and transparent budgets for every recommendation, as has been the case with previous Royal Commissions.

“We’re calling on the federal government to immediately accept all recommendations and take responsibility for their implementation. What is happening in Perth shows just how critical immediate action is,” said Ms Dodds.

In particular, BSCA is calling for clarity on Recommendation 4.5: “Australian, state and territory governments should produce downscaled climate projections.” The federal government supports this recommendation in principle, but is yet to provide full detail as to how it would be implemented.

“As fires become hotter, fiercer and more frequent due to climate change, projections will be crucial for the way communities manage fire risks,” said Fiona Lee, who lost her Warrawillah home in the 2019/20 fires.

“The Royal Commission is clear that climate change is contributing to more frequent fires, and we can expect more in the future. And yet, the Federal Government is unclear on its response to this critical recommendation, and is dragging its feet on reducing emissions at the scale and pace required by the science.

“Communities won’t have peace of mind until we fully understand the risk, and there is a firm target for reaching net zero emissions well before 2040,” said Ms Lee.

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.