spreads (26).gif

Are they blindly protecting Councillor election promises

The Beagle Editor, Your readers might be interested in a letter i have sent to Council The General Manager, Mayor and all Councillors

The council has for around three decades discussed the idea of providing a new community swimming pool and the necessary amenities at Batemans Bay. Council/Councillors and Staff are aware of the cost to all the shire residents of providing pools with the annual maintenance and replacement costs as they are with the Botanic Gardens. The accumulated costs are very substantial to all the shires residents, not just the users of those particular public facilities. The Batemans Bay area population and the aging demographics would hardly justify any expenditures of community funds on any basis providing not just a swimming pool but also the equipment for the talked about aquatic and adjacent performing arts centre. If the user pays philosophy supported by politicians and Governments is to be applied there would be very few in the shires generally regulated income community who could afford to use the Multi Million Dollar facilities as has been proposed.

Until the Batemans Bay area age demographics change and population numbers increase spending public funds on a new swimming and if you like aquatic centre cannot be justified in my opinion.

The purchase of the Old Bowling Club Site in the Mackay Park area precinct can’t be justified either. As a resident and ratepayer I cannot support what has to date been proposed with the Swimming Pool - Aquatic Centre idea that to me seems to have been developed to support a couple of Councillors election promises.

Yours Sincerely

Allan Brown

#Opinion #Council

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.