fiona.png
spreads (26).gif

Procedure! Baa humbug


Dear Beagle Editor PROCEDURE! BAA HUMBUG!

Attendees, public forum speakers and webcast watchers of the last council meeting, were witness to yet another example of our Council making decisions behind closed doors.

This decision related to the replacement of David Maclachlan on the Mackay Park Precinct Sunset Committee. David resigned due to disillusionment with council’s ‘orchestrated’ committee meetings that ‘marginalised expertise, stakeholders and community’ and did not allow for ‘informed discussions’.

At the Dec 12 council meeting, the item relating to his replacement was introduced by the Chair as:

“I put agenda item PSR17/073 .........., Mackay Park Sunset Committee, moved by Councillor Brown with an amendment, seconded by Councillor Constable.” One might wonder as to what this amendment was, as did all who were watching!

After all, amendments to motions are supposed to occur in open meetings of council, to allow the public to witness deliberations and decisions made by their representatives.

However, this did not occur. In fact, the amended motion was not revealed until Councillor Constable read it out, 10 minutes later.

The original agenda recommendation was: “Seek expressions of interest within the business community to fill the vacancy on the Batemans Bay Mackay Park Precinct Sunset Committee.”


The amended motion was: “At this time not fill the vacancy on the Batemans Bay Mackay Park Precinct Sunset Committee.”

The agenda ‘recommendation’ appears to have been amended, at the briefing prior to the public council meeting.

This is not permitted under council’s Code of Meeting Practice or Legislation.

In regard to briefings, Council’s Code states:

5) No recommendations are to be put to, and no agreement sought from councillors

6) No decision-making process can form part of any particular briefing. Briefings do not have any decision-making authority or powers

7) Briefings should not be used for ....... discussions where agreement is reached and/or a (de-facto) decision is made.

Failing to comply with meeting procedure is but yet another example of Council concealing the decision making process around this development, with the community being denied any input.

The Mayor and some Councillors keep reiterating that ratepayers will be allowed input if/when funding is granted. Trouble is, only minor alterations to the concept plan will be permitted by the NSW Sports and Infrastructure Fund.

So basically, we will be stuck with what council staff have decided behind closed doors.

Yours Sincerely

Patricia Gardiner

Deua River Valley


#Opinion #latest #Council #LocalStateFederal

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts


Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.