spreads (3).gif

For our Bega Shire readers - just another flim flam man?

just another flimflam man?

Like an itinerant horse-fly, the NSW Opposition Health spokesperson, the Hon Walt Secord, MLC, blew in yesterday morning, loudly advocating that the state government should strip local councils of their decision-making responsibilities relating to the fluoridation of drinking water supplies.

While the Bega Valley Shire Residents & Ratepayers Association (BVSRRA) has previously acknowledged Mr Secord’s right to his opinion, it does not share his evangelical desire to strip communities of their democratic right to make decisions that directly affect them.

Mr Secord has previously lambasted groups opposed to the further fluoridation of drinking water supplies in the Bega Valley, belligerently asserting that “they don’t have a right to impose their views on the community”, while hypocritically claiming that exact same right for himself.

Regrettably, Mr Secord displays all the hallmarks of the quintessential modern politician, prosecuting his opinions with a shrill, high-speed precision that leaves no room for anyone else’s voice.

The association would like to suggest that if Mr Secord is genuinely interested in the wellbeing of the people of the south coast, he could take steps to bring his government colleagues & the faceless, nameless, unaccountable bureaucrats who run NSW Health like a ‘secret kingdom’ to account over their obscene treatment of Dr Chris Phoon & his family.

If Mr Secord could effectively respond to that worthy challenge, it just might be that the community would be willing to listen to his views on other issues, rather than possibly thinking of him as being just another flimflam man.

John Richardson


Bega Valley Shire Residents & Ratepayers Association

#Opinion #Bega

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.