spreads (2).gif

AFMA provide no answers on pair trawling to replace Super Trawler

AFMA provides no answers with public comment closing on pair trawling in the SPF By Jereme Lane | 30 January 2017 | Fishing World THE Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) has once again slapped recreational fishos in the face by refusing to answer key questions regarding the pair trawling operation that could replace the controversial super trawler. The recently departed Geelong Star supertrawler – and its predecessor the Abel Tasman – created huge controversy in the Small Pelagic Fishery (SPF) over several years mainly due to the veil of secrecy maintained over its operations by both industry and government. With no super trawler currently operating in Australian waters AFMA has received an application from Atlantis Fisheries Consulting Group to fish the SPF using a pair trawling operation, something that is not currently allowed.Pair trawling involves the use of two boats to shoot and drag a large net through the water to catch schooling slimy mackerel and other species, which will then be sold as aquaculture feed and recreational fishing bait. You can read the rest of this article on Fishing World at this link.

The above article extract is republished with kind permission of Fishing World - Be sure to visit their website to read the rest of the article and the array of comments Also take the time to subscribe to their excellent twice weekly newsletter

#Sports #latest #Federal

COMMENTS : Due to the risks associated with comments from unidentified contributors that expose The Beagle to possible legal actions under the NSW Defamation Act 2005 No 77 anonymous or Nom de Plume comments will not be available unless the author is known to the editor by way of a verified email address or by association.

Others who provide their REAL NAME (first name AND Surname) and a verifiable email address (it won't be published) are invited to comment below. (yes it is a pain but please comply - it would be a  shame to see your comment deleted)

Those contributors KNOWN to us and verified may continue to use their First Name or Nom de plume for ease. The primary need for all of this is due to traceability should a legal action arise.

If you need anonymity email us via our normal or encrypted email accounts

Please note that if you are looking for a previous comment that is no longer visible please contact us.